search icon
blog banner

5G RedCap (NR-Light) Explained: Bridging the Gap Between LTE and Full 5G

5G IoT Networks Wireless Engineering

November 6, 2025

The evolution from 4G LTE to 5G has been a defining leap in mobile connectivity. While 4G revolutionized the consumer internet by enabling fast broadband speeds for smartphones and video streaming, 5G was envisioned as a universal platform for both human and machine communication. It was created with the goal of supporting high-performance applications such as immersive XR experiences, connected autonomous vehicles, and industrial automation. In technical terms, the goal was to unlock gigabit-level throughput, ultra-low latency, and massive device density.

However in practice, not every connected device needs the full scale and complexity of 5G. Many IoT and industrial devices require moderate speeds, reliable coverage and long battery life at a lower cost. As the early phases of 5G deployment focused largely on smartphones and high-end use cases, there was a gap for these “mid-tier” devices that needed more than LTE but far less than premium 5G.

This is where 5G Reduced Capability (RedCap) comes in. Introduced in 3GPP Release 17, RedCap is a streamlined version of 5G NR designed to extend the benefits of 5G. Capabilities such as native 5G core connectivity and lower latency had to trickle down to cost-sensitive, power-constrained devices like industrial sensors, wearables, and video surveillance systems.

What is RedCap?

5G Reduced Capability, or 5G NR-Light, is a new device platform that balances capability and complexity for mid-tier use cases. To emphasize its use case, a simple RedCap device can reduce complexity by more than half, while delivering expected data rates. In addition, clever radio resource management (RMM) can lower power consumption leading to a longer battery life. Given below is a simple comparison of full 5G NR capabilities and those of 5G RedCap.

Feature Full 5G NR 5G RedCap
Typical bandwidth Up to 100 MHz+ ~20 MHz (FR1), 100 MHz (FR2)
MIMO antennas 4×4 or higher Usually 1×1 or 2×2
Peak data rates Gbps range ~150–300 Mbps downlink
Latency 1–4 ms (URLLC) Few ms to tens of ms
Device complexity High Reduced (fewer RF chains, simpler modems)
Power consumption High Low
Target devices Smartphones, XR Wearables, cameras, industrial sensors

 

  • Some simplifications are optional depending on the device class, as a RedCap device might choose which subset of features to support.
  • RedCap still supports many NR bands both FR1 (sub-6 GHz) and potentially FR2 (mmWave) if the design supports it. So it can coexist across the same spectrum as full NR devices.
  • The network side is aware of RedCap devices and can bar or admit them selectively per cell if needed, e.g. in cells congested with full NR traffic.

Coexistence and Network Considerations

Because RedCap devices share spectrum and radio resources with regular NR devices, the network must manage coexistence:

  • Scheduling and Resource Partitioning: The base station scheduler must be aware of RedCap’s limited bandwidth or antenna constraints to avoid overallocation. The network might allocate narrower resource blocks (RBs) or use differentiated scheduling.
  • Interference Management: Since RedCap devices may use simpler reception and lower sensitivity, the cell planning and interference margins may require adjustments to preserve link quality.
  • Access Control: As mentioned earlier, cells may block or preferentially accept RedCap devices. For example, disallowing RedCap in dense urban sites to avoid conflict with full NR performance requirements.
  • RAN Software Upgrade Only: Vendors promote that supporting RedCap is largely a software upgrade to existing 5G RAN infrastructure, with no major hardware overhaul needed.
  • Network Energy Efficiency: Since RedCap devices tend to be lighter, the overall energy per bit in the network can improve when many such devices operate. However, this depends on how the network optimizes resource allocation, control signaling and power states.

Performance, Trade-offs and Design Choices

RedCap balances performance with simplicity by reducing bandwidth, MIMO layers and advanced features. This lowers cost and power consumption while still delivering sufficient data rates for most mid tier IoT and wearable use cases.
However, this comes with trade offs such as lower peak throughput, slightly higher latency than URLLC and the need for careful network optimization (especially in mmWave bands) to maintain efficiency and consistent service quality.

Throughput vs. Complexity

  • As RedCap restricts bandwidth, MIMO, and aggregation, the peak throughput is lower than full NR. But for many mid-tier applications (e.g. video sensors, AR glasses, industrial monitors), the achievable rates are quite sufficient.
  • Designers must balance simplification with performance retention. More aggressive simplifications yield lower cost/power, but limit use case applicability.

Power and Battery Life Gains

  • The biggest win for RedCap is improved energy efficiency. By reducing hardware complexity (fewer RF chains, simpler modulation, limited active time), battery life can be extended significantly.
  • Beam management and control overhead are energy burdens. Recent studies propose dynamically adjusting beam update intervals, beamwidth, discovery timing to trade off performance vs energy consumption.
  • In scenarios with many RedCap devices, small inefficiencies in control signaling can accumulate. Hence network-level optimization is essential when implementing these devices.

Latency and QoS Trade-offs

  • RedCap can still support relatively low latency, but because of simplified hardware and fewer parallel paths, it cannot approach the most stringent URLLC levels.
  • For many mid-tier use cases (e.g. video streaming, sensor telemetry), this is acceptable since ultra-low latency is not mandatory.

Operation at mmWave and Higher Bands

  • If RedCap devices support FR2 (mmWave), they must incorporate beamforming/directionality. But the simplifications mean more careful design is needed (wider beams, less frequent sweeps) to stay energy efficient.
  • Some research explores how RedCap can operate in mmWave bands in industrial settings, balancing complexity and cost with throughput gains.

Use Cases for 5G RedCap (NR-Light)

As discussed 5G RedCap is suited for devices needing more capabilities than LTE-M/NB-IoT, but don’t need the extreme throughput and ultra-low latency of full 5G eMBB or URLLC. It strikes a balance between data rate, complexity, power consumption and cost. This is what makes it a good fit for the next wave of IoT and edge applications across industries.

Wireless Industrial Sensors and Automation

Factories require real time visibility into aspects like equipment, uptime, safety controls and predictive maintenance. Traditional wired systems are costly to scale and maintain.

RedCap offers a reliable uplink for sensor data, alarms and status updates. Additionally, it allows for better scalability in dynamic shop floor environments.

Smart Grids and Utilities

Utilities can use real time data to adjust for demand, detect outages and automating substations. It offers reliable mid bandwidth connectivity for grid sensors, smart meters and other control devices. It also supports wider coverage and easier deployment than wired links, while enabling remote management.

Smart Wearables & Health Devices

Wearable use cases such as child tracking, elder monitoring and remote worker safety can benefit from cellular connectivity, freeing them from smartphone requirement. Additionally, low complexity devices such as wearable benefit from the lower complexity and power requirements.

Video Surveillance & Smart Cameras

Legacy LTE struggles in dense environments with consistent video uplink. 5G RedCap removes the need for complex 5G modems, providing scalability and good throughput at lower costs. Subsequently, this makes it suitable for city surveillance, remote monitoring and transport hubs.

What Comes Next for NR-Light Deployments

RedCap is still in its early stages. Its adoption will depend on various factors like operator readiness, device ecosystem maturity and how 5G is rolled out across regions. As 5G networks are widely deployed, the priority is still towards enhanced mobile broadband and fixed wireless access over massive IoT. Hence, this technology will likely see a phased and gradual rollout.

Short Term: 5G NSA (Non-Standalone) Era

Most global operators currently run 5G in NSA mode, where 5G radios are anchored to 4G cores. This setup does not fully support RedCap’s efficiency gains, especially in power consumption and latency.

Mid Term: 5G SA (Standalone) Maturity

Transition to 5G Standalone cores will open doors for wider adoption of RedCap. It will unlock features such as

  • Reduced signaling overhead
  • Better power efficiency
  • Network slicing support
  • Private 5G compatibility

As SA matures, RedCap could become commercially viable for large scale IoT rollouts. In this environment, we will see mass market availability of modules, lower chipset costs and better interoperability.

Long Term: Broader Ecosystem Scale Up

Finally as more operators support full SA networks, RedCap could become cost competitive with LTE Cat-1/Cat-4 in sectors such as industrial automation, energy, smart cities and healthcare.

Preparing for the Next Wave of IoT

5G RedCap fills an important gap in the connectivity landscape. It offers a balance of bandwidth, power efficiency and low cost that is viable for massive IoT use cases. While its in early stages, it offers potential for large fleets of connected devices with multi year lifecycles.

As 5G Standalone (SA) networks mature and RedCap becomes more available, organizations will have a path beyond LTE that supports more scalable IoT deployments.

X
We will get back to you!
X
We will get back to you!

More Blogs

×

Enquire Now


We will treat any information you submit with us as confidential

arrow back top